By Helen F. Rice, Esq.
On January 9, the Supreme Court of Georgia issued a ruling in a divorce case (Shaw v. Shaw, No. S11F1586) that should not come as any great surprise – the husband and wife were ordered to divide assets held in a jointly titled investment account equally between the two of them. The twist in this case, however, was that the funds in the account were inherited by the husband from his mother. Georgia courts have consistently held that property inherited by one spouse during a marriage remains the separate property of the spouse who receives it. Why, then, would it be fair for the Court to order the parties to divide up an inheritance in their divorce?
In the Shaw case, the husband had established an investment account and deposited his inheritance into it. None of his other assets were added to or commingled with the inheritance, and the wife never made any deposits of her own funds into the account. However, from the outset, the husband set up the investment account in the name of both himself and his wife, to be held as joint tenants with right of survivorship. The Supreme Court found that the simple act of setting the account up as a joint account was sufficient evidence of the husband’s intent to transform his separate property into marital property, and therefore, to share it with his wife.
Similarly, when the husband inherited a piece of Florida real estate from his mother, he directed that it be deeded to both himself and his wife jointly. The Court again found that this action transformed the property into a marital asset, and as a result, the property was ordered to be divided between husband and wife equally in their divorce.
The lesson here is simple: if you don’t want to be potentially forced to divide your assets with your spouse someday, keep them separate and in your own name. Savvy couples who identify potential issues like this before they marry can execute a pre-nuptial agreement that will clarify their intent to keep separate property separate during the marriage and prevent a result like the Shaw ruling. If you don’t have a pre-nup, keeping your separate property in your own individual name is your best protection. There are estate planning tools you can use to ensure that your spouse receives the property at your death, if your marriage remains intact and that is your wish; or you can direct that your separate property is to be distributed to your children or other heirs at your death, allowing only marital property to pass to your spouse. When in doubt, consult an attorney. Asking questions in advance is always the best way to avoid problems and substantial legal expenses later – just ask Mr. Shaw!
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
